|duncan webster||08/04/2021 18:48:29|
|3987 forum posts|
I'd make the shell from 4" 16g and the firebox from 3.5" 16g. Then you roll a ring from 3/16" square to make up the gap, a lot easier than making the conical firebox
|Jeff Dayman||08/04/2021 19:29:46|
|2225 forum posts|
Just my opinion Bob, but I don't think having the firebox inner and outer shell meet at a sharp junction with no foundation ring is a good idea. Depending on the water you use, there may be a lot of sediment buildup at the lower end of the boiler. If it is a small space tapering to a point, it will fill quickly and you may get plate overheating if there isn't water between the shell and firebox inner because the space is full of sediment. A foundation ring provides a) a water space to keep plates cool / transfer heat, b) a wide ledge for sediment to fall on, and be shifted / blown off during blowdown. Food for thought.
Edited By Jeff Dayman on 08/04/2021 19:31:49
|Nigel Graham 2||09/04/2021 08:56:31|
|2133 forum posts|
Yes - your modifications all looks good, but I note Jeff's observation on taking the firebox wall out to the shell, without a foundation-ring. Looking at your second drawing the annulus is finely-tapered and as Jeff says, could silt or scale up quite easily. Thinking about it further, the full-size boilers made without a foundation-ring had a step formed round the firebox shell so the water-space stayed wide for its full depth.
If the fuel is to be spirit or better, gas, you are not going to need to open the smoke-box very often, but if the rings will be prominent, visible features on the finished model, then fit them even though dummies. .Faithful external details, even if not functional in miniature, greatly enhance the complete model.
|Bob Wild||02/05/2021 22:45:54|
|86 forum posts|
Thanks chaps for all your useful comments, and sorry about the delay in replying. SWMBO insisted on using the relaxing of lockdown to use the opportunity to go off in our caravan for a much needed break. Anyway, I have made a strategic decision which may not meet with the approval of some. This model will only run on air. Firstly, it makes the construction simpler and secondly, it means that I can show it in my display cabinet along with my other models. As I said earlier, if it was good enough for Cherry Hill then it’s good enough for me.
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.