|175 forum posts|
I want to buy a QCTP, but which type? Piston, Dixon, Wedge, etc.
Clearly the decision is going to be a combination of function, reliability and quality. Any thoughts appreciated.
The toolpost is for a Warco WM240.
|Michael Gilligan||19/03/2020 09:22:20|
16176 forum posts
With respect, Bo’sun ... I see you have omitted the criterion of price from your list.
This may be of no consequence to you, or it may be decisive !!
Any of the types listed will be available in various qualities, and a good example of one type will be better than a bad example of another. ... There is nothing fundamentally wrong with any of the designs; it’s the quality of manufacture that counts.
|175 forum posts|
Thank you Michael,
Yes, price is important, but not if the sacrifice is quality and reliability (I think you know where I'm coming from).
Warco recommend their version of the Dixon type for the WM240, which, I have to admit,looks very nice. I just feel the sensible thing to do, is to look at the other options out there before taking the plunge.
I'd like to think you get what you pay for, but with an item I have limited experience with, I'm looking for some guidance.
|Ian Parkin||19/03/2020 09:54:55|
827 forum posts
Another consideration is to do with price as well
how many tool holders do you expect to end up with
i bought the Chinese piston type first (300 size)was quite happy with it but always had niggling doubts about its ridigity and repeatability
so at great expense bought a wedge type from USA ( 300 size not common over here)
and happy with that
ive had a Dixon type which came with my lathe but toolholders so expensive so sold that
and dabbled with a multifix ( the best in my opinion) but holders very expensive so sold that
But all told now i have 50 toolholders all 300 size with various tools attachments in them.
so i would base your needs on the cost of toolholders...
Edited By Ian Parkin on 19/03/2020 09:57:11
1011 forum posts
My three pennyworth -- whilst most of the designs are probably OK personally I favour the Dickson design this along with the Multifix are as far as i am aware the oldest designs around, Dickson originating in the UK and the Multifix in Switzerland I believe.
I have been using Dickson tool posts since the 1960's and consequently favour them, however as Michael rightly points out there are many qualities of manufacture. If price is not a main criteria I would choose those made by Bison, if price is a consideration then I would buy from one of the main supplier's [RGD, Chronos,Myford etc] but whoever you choose should you need additional holders buy from the same source.
|Barrie Lever||19/03/2020 10:02:33|
|688 forum posts|
I looking to change my QCTP to a Multifix style, I see a lot of advantages in the Multifix type of tool post.
A quick history lesson on Multifix QCTP, they were originally a Swiss design from the 1940's, at some stage they were copied by many companies all over the World and good copies are still in production.
Currently there is a good Chinese copy which I think is sold by Chronos and there is also a good German copy which is sold direct by the manufacturer who are called PeWeTools, they are on Ebay.
I think the big thing with the Multifix style is the indexable positioning that it gives, this will be very useful for my work.
|Brian G||19/03/2020 10:17:22|
|707 forum posts|
I'm reasonably happy with the (Aloris copy) piston type but should we change to the wedge type we won't need to buy new toolholders as both take the same type.
One thing to consider is whether your compound slide is flat-topped or there is a spigot on which the 4-way is mounted. If there is a spigot it is easy to machine the piston type to fit over it, but for a wedge type you will need to either remove the spigot completely or do as I have done and machine it down to fit the toolpost. I managed to do this on the mill, but otherwise you would need access to another lathe or a raising block for the 4-way (which could perhaps then be re-used as a rear toolpost).
|175 forum posts|
Thank you all for the quick responses,
If I take quality and stupidly expensive out of the equation, does any particular design shine through? Although it sounds like not.
To answer one of the questions above, I intend to have about 7 tool holders.
|Bryan Cedar 1||19/03/2020 12:06:32|
|51 forum posts|
I recently bought a set of QCTP from Chronos for my Myford S7 but had to return them as the screw that is tapped into the tool holders were of different lengths. The holes were of similar depth but the tapping allowed the screws to screw down to different lengths and would not allow 8mm tools to be set to centre height. Bought a similar set from RGD which were obviously by a different maker, they were perfect. Tried to lock the Chronos threads with a thread lock but it would not take due to oil contamination which I could not remove in the tapped holes. Cannot understand why Chronos did not seem to know of this problem.
2721 forum posts
... 'To answer one of the questions above, I intend to have about 7 tool holders'.
I have a WM250V-F lathe & have a ' Bison ' clone of the Dickson type qctp bought at auto jumble sale near York with 5 holders, it suits me just fine. I now have 18 tool holders each set up with particular tools & dial gauge & have used them all at some time or other, some bought from RDG at Harrogate exihib' some off eBay, some with the 'M - W' stamped on, all have averaged around£15 ea, so I would rethink '7 tool holders'... . Usual disclaimer applies.
|Tony Pratt 1||19/03/2020 12:24:48|
|1175 forum posts|
I have worked with most types in industry which were quality made but there are a lot of inferior products now on the hobbyist market, for that reason I sold off my Dickson clone & got a wedge type from Arc Euro, very pleased with it so far.
As an aside I am using a Multifix atm for work & I wouldn't pay the price they are going for.
1349 forum posts
I got the wedge type. Very happy with it. Grips very tight against the dovetail. Was not expensive They come in a few sizes. I think 250-000 is the smallest. I bought the 2nd size up, which is the 250-111. Had to do a little work on the stud length.
|not done it yet||19/03/2020 13:58:14|
|4865 forum posts|
I bought a piston type as a set. Bad decision as some holders were later not considered suitable for use (parting tool not horizontal - so needs resetting every time the blade is extended/retracted; ‘push’ type knurling tool - scissor type are far better for the machine). I bought the piston type because tool holders are cheaper, or easier to make.
Since then, a further two ‘not quite so quick to change’ QCTPs have come my way. They all get used, but the piston type is used most - one of them only has one small tool cutter mounted most of the time. They are all fitted to the compound slide by T-nut. A rear parting-off tool is mostly a permanent fixture - only removed when ‘in the way’- and at least a street better than the cutter fitted in an over-hanging tool holder perched on a compound slide.🙂
I anticipate actually getting round to making more piston type tool holders and moving on the other two sets.
I have considered the ‘multifix’ option and would love to have one, but just cannot really justify the price for a hobby. Cheaper ones may not be consistent and tool holders are more complex/expensive. Even a cheap one, with sufficient tool holders, would cost over half of what the (basic) machine cost me.🙂 The machine might deserve it, but it won’t happen for a while....
QCTPs are a minefield as it is, careful choice is needed and favourite is likely down to the individual. QCTPs are an added possibility for reduced cutter rigidity; multiple 4-way tool posts might even be a better option in some instances.
Edited By not done it yet on 19/03/2020 13:59:45
698 forum posts
I guarantee you will end up wanting more....
I started with 3 genuine, made another 10, then made another six, now 19 in total and i still want/need more...
Excluding a genuine 4 way i don't like using and a home made lantern that i do....
|Ian P||19/03/2020 14:41:35|
2409 forum posts
Is there an easy explanation of what the different type of QCTP are defined as. Dickson and Multifix make sense to me (I can picture them in my mind) but with 'wedge' and 'piston' its not obvious where either of these two technologies are appliued in the QCTP
Is the piston the cylindrical pillar that the individual toolholders clamp or is the part that pulls the toolhoder against the Vee's of a Dickson. Wedge too is a loose term, does it refer to the 'cam' action of a Dickson?
|Ian Parkin||19/03/2020 15:00:54|
827 forum posts
the piston and wedge type are very similar the toolholders are the same
but the piston pushes the toolholders out against the dovetails
the wedge type pulls the holders in towards the block
951 forum posts
I have a Warco BV 20 lathe, no longer a current model, and I bought a Dickson type from RDG. I was happy with the quality and the price was reasonable with extra tool holders available also at very reasonable prices.
|John Baron||19/03/2020 16:53:43|
305 forum posts
FWIW, I got rid of my Dickson tool post and three holders and made my own Norman patent tool post. Much cheaper.
I also made one for the rear of the cross slide that is used to hold the parting off blade.
|229 forum posts|
A wedge and piston tool post and tool holders fabricated from mild steel are fairly easyif you have access to a mill with a dovetail cutter.
The mottley collection in my workshop have stood up to hobby machining very well for well over ten years.
|Graham Stoppani||20/03/2020 06:00:53|
79 forum posts
Last year I replaced my Dickson type tool holder with a wedge type one from ARC Eurotrade. Very happy with the new tool holder. My reason for changing was the old tool holder had too much play in it that allowed the tools to deflect downwards slightly while cutting. The wedge design by its nature takes up any slack when you tighten it which the Dickson type does not.
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.