|5782 forum posts|
Agree we're not out of the woods yet. Round here increasing numbers have got bored and ignoring the separation rules. As the infection rate has fallen due to the lock-down, 'common sense' suggests the danger is over, even though it isn't. It could bounce back. The 1918 Pandemic (which killed about 150 million people), came in 3 waves, not one. Let's hope Covid-19 fizzles out after only one.
Looking at the international statistics it appears that whilst Europe is over the worst, plenty of other places are just starting up. Even if there isn't a second wave where we happen to live, the pandemic is still causing big trouble elsewhere. It'll be a while before the world gets back to normal.
My plan, because I can, is to simply keep my distance for the foreseeable future. I'm not rushing out to Pubs, Clubs, Cinemas, Public Transport or a Rave just yet. But I'm not worried about taking deliveries or the odd 2 metre chat.
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 27/05/2020 16:08:16
|Martin Kyte||27/05/2020 16:40:31|
1843 forum posts
The point being that the virus hasn't got less infective or less harmfull. Our behaviour to now has had a benificial effect.
|Ian Skeldon 2||27/05/2020 18:28:06|
|486 forum posts|
One thing I have seen for myself is that this virus seems to be very infectious it infects people so easily, the other thing I have seen is that the outcome will vary a great deal. The general health of the newly infected person does make some difference, as do other factors such as gender and general fitness level, it also seems to be more serious for non European people and of course some elderly people.
I would agree that we are a long way away from breathing a sigh of relief, this is the time the virus will catch those that believe that it is safe to go back to doing normal things and that could cause a second wave or spike in the reported cases.
|old mart||27/05/2020 18:52:07|
|1771 forum posts|
The second part of a Horizon documentary has been aired recently, and is worth watching if you can get it.
|not done it yet||28/05/2020 08:28:19|
|4647 forum posts|
As I see it, it is just the numbers that have decreased and the outcome, if one gets the virus, is likely no different than at the height of the infections - just that the NHS is not going to be drowned in cases.
My wife has no spleen, so if she were to be infected, she could well be added to the statistics. We are still not out of the woods until some better, more effective, forms of treatment or prevention are available.
Edited By not done it yet on 28/05/2020 08:29:09
|Tony Pratt 1||28/05/2020 09:07:21|
|1126 forum posts|
NDIY, agreed if you get the infection now the outcome will be 'more or less' the same for each person as it would have been but I don't think the NHS will be overwhelmed & the doctors are learning every day so treatment will get better, they are now talking about the collateral damage for all the patients who the NHS haven't treated in the past couple of months
|Mick B1||28/05/2020 09:23:23|
|1576 forum posts|
Some news reports are disputing that - although there're still no proven effective treatments, staff have learned to manage the progress of the disease better. I read that at the start of the pandemic, over half of patients who went onto ventilators would go under, and now it's less than a third. It's not the answer to a maiden's prayer, but it is a significant improvement.
|Kiwi Bloke||28/05/2020 13:29:18|
|425 forum posts|
Three things to consider (out of many more, of course)...
1. Until the number of infected people is known as accurately as the number of deaths from the disease, the true population death rate from the disease can't be calculated. Because there seems to be a large proportion of infected people who never get diagnosed, partly because disease screening isn't being done and because not all infected people develop significant symptoms, the prevalence of the disease remains unknown.
2. An individual's risk of death depends greatly on the individual's circumstances, and isn't simply related to the population's death rate.
3. The old and infirm seem to be at greatest risk of death. Countries in which people tend to die before they get old, or have a 'young' population for whatever reason, or who don't survive infirmity, can be expected to show a lower death rate than, say, UK, where the wonderful NHS keeps old wrecks going far longer than they might in countries without universal high-quality health care. So, a country's death rate (from coronavirus) may tell you more about the population's characteristics, or the way data is collected, than it does about the intrinsic lethality of the disease, or the adequacy of available healthcare. Or not - you just can't tell, because the data isn't there yet.
Apologies to any old wrecks reading this - no offence meant.
|Tim Hammond||28/05/2020 13:40:31|
|22 forum posts||
None taken! From an Old Wreck in Hampshire.
|Martin Kyte||28/05/2020 16:32:29|
1843 forum posts
The science museum just did a piece on our Labs efforts at imaging the virus for those who are interested.
|Neil Wyatt||28/05/2020 16:45:25|
17896 forum posts
Fascinating ... you are essentially using the same methods of stacking and drizzling to reduce noise and improve resolution as we use on astronomical images.
I wonder if the program WinJuPos which derotates and stacks images, then can produce images at different rotations and maps in different projections might be useful?
|Neil Wyatt||28/05/2020 16:51:53|
17896 forum posts
Interesting, but not the whole story.
Japan which has a population of average age about 8 years older than the UK has had 17,000 cases and less than 1,000 deaths, and just 28 new cases yesterday.
The average age in Brazil is over 8 years less than the UK and things are going badly.
I think the ways different societies have implemented lockdowns and tracing are the main variables.
|Martin Kyte||28/05/2020 17:57:00|
1843 forum posts
Sjors has developed some very sophisticated software to do the analysis to get to atomic resolution. The data is collected by direct electron detectors and is essentially at video rates. Terabytes of the stuff. The computational cluster has 4000 cores.
|Barrie Lever||28/05/2020 19:40:16|
|574 forum posts|
My son works in a small electronics company, one of the products they manufacture is a UV tower that is placed in a room/ward/clinic etc that needs disinfecting.
They made 45 of these machines over 3 years up until the Wu Flu crisis, the machines are very expensive and exported Globally, as soon as the virus hit us, they had orders for 50 machines placed upon them, so all hands to the pumps.
However they are struggling to get the specialised UV tube and ballast made by Phillips in Holland, they found out today why.
Just before the crisis kicked off a major Superpower (not the USA) bought up the Global stock of the UV tubes and ballasts, so Philips are struggling to keep up with fulfilling orders.
|mark smith 20||28/05/2020 19:49:45|
|671 forum posts|
Does anyone else think this lockdown relaxation is too early? I mean estimated new infections in the overall comunity (by office national statistics) of 8 - 9000 a day is not a small amount of people to me.
Edited By mark smith 20 on 28/05/2020 19:50:25
|mark smith 20||29/05/2020 15:07:43|
|671 forum posts|
|Harry Wilkes||31/05/2020 08:47:00|
895 forum posts
And your point is ?
|pgk pgk||31/05/2020 09:17:06|
|1792 forum posts|
Let's not forget that the original idea behind lockdown was to 'flatten the curve' and avoid overwhelming the NHS. Gov admitted early on that they were suprised by public compliance. Fear worked, probably helped by the appalling figures for mortality amongst those admitted to hospital; figures which suggest either that the UK strain was somehow worse than some other countries or by some poorer approach to treatment here. It will be some time in the future (or hidden from public) as to how our therapy performance compared to elsewhere.
From the viewpoint of Gov there are all the other consideration - economic woes, loss of access to other medical needs - delayed surgeries, dentistry, mental health, home abuse and lockdown mental stress and as always the inevitable shuffling or blame and criticisms associated with political capital and political point scoring.
With no effective therapy or vaccine on an immediate horizon then the only solution is to slowly let the virus work it's way through the population and sort itelf out because we don't have the ability or resources to quarantine the whole country due to our dependance on imports and a Gov that wants to be on a world stage. Without so doing any reduction in cases will just end with subsequent flare-ups - this whole thing started UK with only a few cases and they are going to keep coming in.
|J Hancock||31/05/2020 12:42:49|
|406 forum posts|
We are all, two or three generations on, survivors of the ' Spanish Flu'.
No lockdowns then, so what happened ?
Did all our 'parents' get it and survive ?
Are the survivors today the ones who inherited some immunity from that earlier time ?
For sure, the next few weeks will show whether all this 'sacrifice' has been worthwhile, or a complete
|Harry Wilkes||31/05/2020 15:05:56|
895 forum posts
My concern is a second wave not so much due to the easing of restrictions but more for the general attitude to it, maybe I'm not alone but for every person i know who as followed the guidelines I know several that haven't so i think this 'it won't get me' will come back and bite us in the backside.
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.