874 forum posts
At least they're likely to be a reasonable landlord, but if they plan on selling regardless, then it's anyone's guess who will buy.
One of my previous neighbours was charged something north of £400 for permission to build a small extension, and another told they would have a fee to pay as they'd added a wooden summerhouse down the garden.
You don't need many of those to get payback if you've bought a bulk lot of leases at a Mark Jenkinson auction at Bramhall Lane, assuming they get them at a knock down rate.
Do you have a copy of your lease, for either you or a solicitor, to check the small print? Is there anything about Chancel Repair Liability in there?
Perhaps Mr Shaw could tell you if he thinks it worthwhile engaging him.
Edited By peak4 on 16/10/2019 21:31:32
|julian atkins||16/10/2019 21:57:12|
1219 forum posts
I have purchased the freehold for 2 previous houses/homes I have owned. It simplifies things if you sell.
My first house was on a long lease dating back to around 1890. Minimal ground rent. As I was then an Articled Clerk/Trainee Solicitor, I cheekily asked the leaseholder's Solicitor if the £150 charge to buy the freehold could be waived, which it was, and I was sent a bill for the legal costs of £50 (This was 1990).
My second house had title deeds that were 13" high when stacked on my desk. The house was subject to 2 long leases with nominal ground rent going back to the 1800s (2 different parcels of land that constituted part of the property; there was additionally a 3rd parcel that was freehold). I was then a qualified Solicitor. I knew the Solicitor for the freeholder of the 2 leases, and I think it cost me £250 in total to buy the 2 freeholds. I submitted to the Land Registry what a colleague of 40 years experience described as the most complex application he had ever encountered. The 13" stack of deeds was reduced to a simple 1 page Land Registration A4 sheet. A subsequent sale was very quick and easy as a result.
With old long leases (typically building leases) of houses with a nominal ground rent, the owner of the freehold often has a liability on their hands, and I would consider the £2500 sale price to be very high and unjustified; so some considerable room for haggling!
|Bob Mc||16/10/2019 22:07:34|
|143 forum posts|
I don't know if anyone has actually looked at the utube parliamentary discussion I mentioned in my last post, but with all due respect for those of you thinking of purchasing freehold...... I would at least consider that the National Leashold Campaign, the organisation trying to abolish leases, is gaining strength with the political help of Sir Peter Bottomley.
Listening to the parliamentary discussion of what the group said just a few days ago, on the 2/10/19 it seems fairly obvious that there are changes afoot and I think it would be best to wait and see what transpires before making a commitment to purchase.
What really makes me hopefull is the disparaging way in which Sir Peter talks about what is known as the "Leasehold Scandal"., and the companies that run them.
What I said in my last post I re-iterate... see utube "parliamentary discussion on Leasehold and Commonhold Parliamentary Reform" , it seems particularly coincidental that freeholds are being offered for sale at this time, and could be due to those companies wanting to make some money before the bottom drops out of their cash cow.
Hope the link below works
|vintage engineer||16/10/2019 22:18:28|
189 forum posts
If they are going to sell it on the open market there must room for profit. If you decide to sell your property the landlord can charge you to reassign the lease to the purchaser.
I would read the lease very carefully.
|4785 forum posts|
The Church of England's assets are managed by the Church Commissioners not by the Church. The Commissioners focus on finance rather than religion, and although they are supposed to act ethically there have been a few embarrassments. The Board of Govenors includes the First Lord of the Treasury and the Lord President of the Council. (Currently Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg.)
Not sure how worried I would be about a 999 year lease. These old long term leases generally have a low impact because many landlords don't even bother to collect the token rents. (£12 a year was well worth collecting in 1918, not now!) But there have also been attempts to raise money by aggresively insisting householders fully meet all the Terms and Conditions of the original agreement. These can get in the way of sales, property development, and impose other inconveniences. The idea seems to be to create enough nusiance so that housholders cough up a relatively small sum to get rid of them. It can all be challenged in the courts but the costs are intimidating. Unlikely that the Church Commissioners are going to behave badly, but they do have a lot of pensions to pay and expensive buildings to maintain. It's their job to raise money...
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 16/10/2019 22:25:56
|julian atkins||16/10/2019 22:36:27|
1219 forum posts
The 'furore' over NEW leaseholds has nothing to do with Ian's case which will be an old probably Victorian long lease with a minimal ground rent and no other charges.
Please note the facts relevant to Ian's case, and not go 'off thread'.
|Mark Simpson 1||17/10/2019 07:01:31|
|69 forum posts|
Buying a freehold from the church Commissioners can be legally "interesting"... I've spent a lot of time with our village Scouts and Guides over the years and we wanted to buy the freehold for a strip of land through which the only road access to our HQ ran. An unoffcial arrangement in 1946 between the vicar led to the 1st HQ being built on his chicken run (wartime meant he was unable to get more hens); no problems for the next 60 years.
Fast forward to the 2000's and with a new HQ built on land we managed to buy behind the original site, we started to try and buy the leasehold for the little access strip.
After more than 10 years we got offered a fair price, but the church set the terms and wanted to use their standard contract. Then it got really interesting, we got a document from their solicitors with dozens of pages of adenda. We were extremely fortunate to have a parent who was a really good land lawyer to strip away 98% of it.
We are not now responsible for the maintenance of a window in the diocesan cathedral or a small %age of the salary of the verger in in the local deanery church and others. It seems that when land was given to the local church in previous centuries, usually to build a school or church, then also there was some commitment to the church hierarchy for the allowing it to happen.
There will probably be some retentions on the land, they get a %age if you sell it at vast profit, you can't turn your house into a "house of ill repute" or a video store??? (always wondered about the video store bit)
Sorry about the length of this diatribe, just make sure your lawyer reads the small print, if it's a standard freehold transfer that should be fine; but look out for all the stuff at the end.
|200 forum posts|
In my opinion it's a 'no brainer'. In years to come you'll think it was a bargain, go for it.
|Colin Heseltine||17/10/2019 08:12:16|
|336 forum posts|
I am just going through this process on my 98 year old fathers behalf so we can sell house when required. Lease had 46 years to run Freehold cost £10800 + survey and solicitors fees (plus vat on fees). With such a short lease time left Banks/Building Societies will not give a mortgage.
|Neil Wyatt||17/10/2019 11:37:19|
16655 forum posts
|Nigel McBurney 1||17/10/2019 17:32:07|
614 forum posts
Dont haggle just buy the leasehold asap while the offer stands,it could be a bargain in future when it comes to selling,I like many other house buyers would never buy a house with any type of lease,you never know when something nasty climbs out of the woodwork, just ask yourself why would any company buy your lease unless there was profit in it ,and in future you may be paying for that profit.And when buying the lease check the small with your solicitor.
|4785 forum posts|
Freehold can also come with strange covenants and conditions. My house deeds state that the pub at the end of the road has the right to discharge sewage across my garden! (The pub is Victorian, built when the area was still fields.) Not too worried because my house is at least a metre higher than the pub and Public Health legislation forbids spraying human effluent about. The minerals rights under the property belong to the Church of England and I'm forbidden from keeping pigs in the house. It's why I had to take up Model Engineering rather than indulge myself in porky pleasures...
|Howard Lewis||17/10/2019 18:13:32|
|2389 forum posts|
Even if it the Church Comissioners, BUY!
Having "owned" and lived in leasehold property, once out of it, I have always gone for freehold. You are then the master of your own destiny, and free from the risk of ground rent being increased, terms and conditions changing etc.
Freehold property usually command s a higher price than the same as a leasehold.
|256 forum posts|
Also, if the lease is less than approx 75yrs ( not the case in this example but.. ) then mortgage lenders are more reluctant to lend on the property if you were to sell, which could well have a negative impact on potential buyers.
|colin wilkinson||17/10/2019 20:26:35|
|57 forum posts|
Bill, Why the question ref Simarc? I have a 900+ year lease with Simarc,£5 every 6 months although there is no possibility of me moving house anyway. Colin
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.