|Alistair Robertson 1||21/02/2019 11:02:12|
|52 forum posts|
Not just relevant to an engineering hobby but may have relevance for a lot of people on this site.
I recently retired and had several personal and works pensions to sort out.
All the personal and most of the works pensions were very good to excellent. One of them pays £125 per month and I worked to them for less that 3 years!
An older one has offered me a monthly plan that will mean I will have to live until I am 98 just to get my money back and if I chose to get 50% for my wife after I am gone she will have to live to 128 years old if I were to die on the day the pension comes in to force!
When I questioned them they said people were living longer and their rates were base on this.
I have tried to move it to other providers but they are much the same.
Has anyone else found a similar situation?
|Dave Halford||21/02/2019 11:44:31|
|419 forum posts|
Drawdown might be your answer
|Mike Poole||21/02/2019 11:47:31|
2019 forum posts
Probably worth taking some professional advice on your options. Good advice costs but making a bad decision could cost a lot more
|2174 forum posts|
Yes, I found the same thing. Annuities were much lower than predicted when I retired. As Dave said, drawdown may be the answer for you. That’s what I’ve done with one of mine. The trick is to avoid paying tax on it!
|4536 forum posts|
Not exactly, but what you say doesn't surprise me. Most government and private pension schemes are struggling. The issue is weak economic growth and low interest rates coupled with people living much longer. The amount of money needed to pay a decent pension for 30+ years is huge. Many changes are being made - as of now, it's all but impossible to find a Final Salary scheme. Pension providers are protecting themselves in expectation of poor fund performance in the future.
Apart from the strain on the pension system, there are at least two other issues brewing. One is that many UK pension providers have been overcharging illegally. This may result in substantial sums having to be repaid to older pensioners, which is likely to impact what newcomers are made to pay. The sins of the fathers... Overcharging is most serious to individuals with several small pensions because these can be completely eaten by admin charges; this you find out when you try to cash them in. Small pensions are best consolidated, but only if you can get the right deal.
Also largish numbers of people have been persuaded to switch pension provider since that was made possible. There is rising concern that most people lost out by switching, and a 'Where you mis-sold a pension?' industry is growing like Topsy.
Can't remember the word for it, but yet another issue is the number of pensions being capped relative to any other pensions you might have - a form of means testing. For example, you might find that a increase in the State Pension results in a counter balancing reduction to a Private Pension, so you don't get what you might expect. Read the small print!
Older pension schemes tend to be much more generous and well protected than new ones. What's happening now to pension schemes is more difficult and hard to understand, whether making the best of what you're about to get, or youngsters investing in the future. I'd recommend anyone with a pension concern to get independent expert help, not from the smooth chap trying to sell you a policy!
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 21/02/2019 12:40:00
4656 forum posts
The starting calculation is quite simple. You will be lucky to live 20 years into retirement. 100% of your pension divided by 20 is 5%. So if it is just a pot of cash you could just take out 5% each year. Then you will be broke but probably won't have an y brain cells left to notice. So any annuity offering you less than 5% will be laughing when you die in less than 20 years. Most of them only offer about 2% at the moment - so the managers can buy big houses and BMWs.
|4536 forum posts|
A little more icing on Bazyle's numbers:
In the past annuities and pensions performed better than cash hidden under the bed because the money collected interest and because they get good tax breaks and other incentives. (If you remove money from a tax-protected scheme, don't be surprised to get whacked for tax you would have otherwise paid!) Not so clear about pensions and annuities today, because interest rates etc are in trouble.
My plan is to mortgage the house and max out 30 different credit cards so I can live wild until an an athletic young floosie finishes me off in a Monte Carlo honeymoon suite. All bills will be left unpaid...
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 21/02/2019 13:56:31
|1279 forum posts|
That athletic young Floosie sounds an attractive proposition SoD - but the timing would be absolutely critical.
I'd have to be sure to kick the bucket before the Wife caught up with us - or she might help me to do so !
|426 forum posts|
How would you know you were with a floosie in the Monte Carlo honeymoon suite if the dementia had kicked in 15 years previously?
|john fletcher 1||21/02/2019 16:17:43|
|516 forum posts|
Alistair talking from experience, be jolly careful when taking financial advice, those experts have a % sign in their head for their reward before any thoughts for you. How do you think they can spend two days a week on the golf course arriving in the top of the range BMW.I 'm sure there must be some good ones. There is great temptation when handling some one else's money. I suggest you read document papers very very carefully before signing, wait two or more weeks have a friend read the documents talk about them and sign. Oh and ask the sales person what is their commission and is there any trail. Oh and I've been to Monte Carlo and saw the Vintage grand prix. John
|Steve Neighbour||21/02/2019 16:43:52|
|17 forum posts|
I too am rapidly approaching that magic age - I have already converted one pension into a 'draw-down' account, and used some of the money to purchase 2 properties with my 'investment' in each being around 40-50% the return or yield can be very tax efficient and you can apportion in different %'s between you and your spouse as required to use all or your tax free allowances (and its way better than ISA's and other traditional saving methods.
I like the max out the credit card and floosie idea that 'SOD' proposed - will I need to make sure my epitaph has a 'sponsored by visa and mastercard' footnote
(better go, the wife wants to know what I'm typing )
|Martin Connelly||21/02/2019 17:01:38|
847 forum posts
According to a financial advisor I spoke to recently managed funds are earning about 4% per year. For the privilege of managing these funds the manager tajkes 3%. Where I live at the moment rental income from property runs about 5% and your capital doesn't get used up. Buy to let looks like a sensible option but doesn't suit every investor.
|Iain Downs||21/02/2019 17:26:16|
|478 forum posts|
I'm either too close to retirement age or too far away depending on whether I consider my actual age or how many more bloody years of work there are...
The guys I've been speaking to recently seem content that they can provide a 6% return on my pension funds before retirement and that's after all charges. That's not a zero risk option, of course, that probably pays close to bugger all.
We're going to be making a decision on an IFA and pension shift fairly soon (like by next week) who will then want reams of paper from us.
No doubt the claimed return will drop for some very plausible reason once we sign up.
|595 forum posts|
The advice I was given by my accountant 30 years ago when I started in business,was do not buy into a pension scheme, instead invest in the stock market, as he considered pension schemes only worked in favour of the provider.
Somewhat dubious I handed him a five figure sum left to me by my grandfather.
Had some sleepness nights, survived black wednesday, but it was good advice.
I have seen my lump sum double in value every five years which is what he said would be the returns.
My three sons all have their own businesses and have followed suit,
Just a thought but not for those of a nervous disposition.
Edited By Bill Chugg on 21/02/2019 17:31:22
|Tony Pratt 1||21/02/2019 17:58:54|
|874 forum posts|
Loads of 'good' advice, I'm just going to do my due diligence & pick an option[s], I don't really need an independent advisor to ask me what I want & then charge me for it.
|272 forum posts|
Shop around for financial advise, 3% is high, I am paying 0.5% to the adviser and 0.4% to the investment plan.
Re estimating your longevity, look at your parents and relatives.
My plan after my wife dies is to buy a barrel of single malt whisky, and pop speed. I will have plenty of energy till I burn out.
|thomas oliver 2||21/02/2019 18:31:26|
|104 forum posts|
I would advise all to look into the powers of the local Social Security Services regarding your Savings and house. If you succumb later to dementia or ill health and need to be placed in a care or nursing home you will have to pay if you have more than £14500 in savings ( Not £25000 as you are usually informed by the government) Current cost of care is around £550 per week. When your savings are used up they can confiscate your house and sell it. The authority can access your bank details going back seven years and if they think you have fiddled your money away to say your family, they can still claim it back. If you get dementia your solicitor will be unable to arrange for one of your family to have "Power of Attorney" to conduct your affairs. So investigate this and make all arrangements before it is too late.
|4536 forum posts|
Indeed, see my mention of a brewing overcharging scandal in the pension industry . Good news, they're not all at it. Bad news, it's currently hard to find out who is, but changes are in the pipeline.
|15 forum posts|
You have to consider all your options for retirement.
I have done reasonably well out of my pension funds. I originally retired from the Northern Rhodesia Government in 1964 on a 10 pounds per month pension which I cashed in for a lump sum ( I did not trust them to continue paying monthly, and I was right ) That lump sum paid for my block of land and a new car when I came to Australia in 1966
The latest pension ripoff in Oz is "superannuation" where you supposedly get a lump sum on retirement. My employer changed to a "super" scheme about 1991 but existing pension fund members did not have to change. I stayed in the pension fund as I would have been much worse off to change.
I took early retirement in 1995, built a new house, doing all internal work myself and also living on part of my savings as my private pension was not quite enough to live comfortably until 2003 when I was eligible for a part Centrelink age pension. My private pension is cost of living adjusted every July and Centrelink reduces my age pension by 70% of that increase. I also receive a magnificent 22 pence per week from the time I worked in England - about $20 paid in December.
If you can afford to take early retirement I recommend you do so. I was asked to go back to work for 4 months and was pleased to refuse as I was going to the Eastern States in my caravan for 3 months.
|The Novice Engineer||21/02/2019 21:29:04|
|48 forum posts|
What I noticed was that the pension companies gave me a default option of an Index Linked Pension with 50 % to my spouse upon my demise. This had the lowest starting sum [around 2.5% per year of the money pot with index linked increase every year ~2.5% of the 2.5% !! ]. Reading the smaller print there was up to 5 alternative options.
I chatted to a number of relatives and older friends, their consensus was take the highest payout so that you have the most money to use whilst you still can. As they aged they could do less and spent less. No one in our family has ever made it to living in care ... they just kept going at home then pegged it.
I took the option that gave me the highest starting sum [around 5% per year of the money pot with no increases]].
Running the numbers though the spreadsheet showed that all the options paid out the roughly the same total amount after 22-25 years. The index linked pension with the lowest starting sum would beat the payout of the highest starting pension after this, by which time I would be 83 .... if I was still around!
To maximise my return from my pension pot I took the Tax Free cash [25% of the pot] and put the money into Shares within an ISA [invested with high Dividend shares] which gives tax free returns.
I have another pension yet to take , I shall probably do drawdown with this.
My 2p worth
Please login to post a reply.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.