By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
Forum sponsored by:
Forum sponsored by Allendale July 23rd

Facing Error

All Topics | Latest Posts

Search for:  in Thread Title in  
SillyOldDuffer12/08/2018 17:04:38
4587 forum posts
980 photos

Today I faced off a new chuck backplate (180mm diameter) and was surprised to find what looks to be a largish error - about 0.23mm over 55mm, low at the centre.

dsc05317.jpg

dsc05319.jpg

The face was cut 0.2mm deep with carbide at 200rpm traversed under power with the saddle locked in X, and the Y gib lock nipped sufficient to provide a little friction.

The carbide insert is a 90 degree 4 cornered type on a 12mm shank.

dsc05320.jpg

 

Is this degree of out of truth excessive on a lathe? Any suggestions as to cause?  I don't think the saddle or tool-post are moving under cutting pressure - everything seems firm.

Thanks

Dave

 

Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 12/08/2018 17:09:23

Michael Gilligan12/08/2018 17:11:28
avatar
13781 forum posts
599 photos

Low at the centre is much better than high

It's a 'fail-safe' arrangement for things that fit face-to-face

BUT Schlesinger would not 'pass' that number !!

MichaelG.

JasonB12/08/2018 17:12:14
avatar
Moderator
15988 forum posts
1680 photos
1 articles

Any movement on the topslide?

Nick Hulme12/08/2018 17:16:54
696 forum posts
37 photos

Few lathes face flat, if they did fitting parts together would be a pig.

JasonB12/08/2018 17:27:39
avatar
Moderator
15988 forum posts
1680 photos
1 articles

Just by way of comparrison I have just put a straight edge across a CI backplate that I machined on my 280 and can't get a 0.05mm feeler gauge under it.

SillyOldDuffer12/08/2018 17:29:29
4587 forum posts
980 photos
Posted by JasonB on 12/08/2018 17:12:14:

Any movement on the topslide?

If I lean heavily on the tool-post I get less than 0.01mm with the DTI on the saddle and on the bed.

dsc05321.jpg

dsc05322.jpg

Sorry about the orientation.

Dave

JasonB12/08/2018 17:39:40
avatar
Moderator
15988 forum posts
1680 photos
1 articles

I meant movement of the slides, you did not say that you locked the topslide so I wondered if it had would itself in.

speelwerk12/08/2018 17:42:30
329 forum posts
1 photos

In theory you messure double the error of around 0.12 mm. Niko.

Neil Wyatt12/08/2018 17:43:46
avatar
Moderator
16415 forum posts
685 photos
74 articles

How are you measuring? If by moving the cross slide you can't be finding the result of top slide error..

What does it look like if you put a straight edge across it.

Could the top slide or saddle have moved during the cut?

Neil

Mick B112/08/2018 18:07:01
1144 forum posts
63 photos

I guess one basic verification is to stick a straight edge across and see:-

(i) whether a 0,2+ feeler would go into any daylight close to the centre, and

(ii) whether the dishing looks straight conical or radiused.

Not that these would diagnose it but they'd confirm and give pointers.

Pete Rimmer12/08/2018 18:12:57
397 forum posts
18 photos

If you swept the face by mounting the dial gauge on the same cross-slide that you used to face the part with the tool, you should see no movement regardless of whether it's face is truly flat or not.. Since you do it points to a worn or maladjusted cross-slide.

blowlamp12/08/2018 18:25:02
avatar
1198 forum posts
82 photos

Remember that running the DTI via the cross slide over the far side of the backplate (first picture) will show double the actual error.

Martin.

SillyOldDuffer12/08/2018 18:33:27
4587 forum posts
980 photos
Posted by Neil Wyatt on 12/08/2018 17:43:46:

How are you measuring? If by moving the cross slide you can't be finding the result of top slide error..

What does it look like if you put a straight edge across it.

Could the top slide or saddle have moved during the cut?

Neil

Not a good photo, taken with a torch behind a set-square in the dark and the blurring makes it look worse than it is:

dsc05323.jpg

Jason may have it - I would have sworn the top-slide was locked and it isn't.

Also, Niko (speelwerk) points out the apparent error is doubled if you measure on the opposite side of from the cut. I think he's right, so the error is 'only' 0.12mm. (Still too big.)

I'm going to try again and make sure everything is 'just so'. If it's not, Pete's mal-aligned cross-slide will need looking at.

For what its worth there is no rotational error, it's only dished excessively.

Watch this space...

Thanks,

Dave

XD 35112/08/2018 18:37:14
avatar
1309 forum posts
111 photos

ILooks like the nib on your dial indicator is loose .

blowlamp12/08/2018 18:41:23
avatar
1198 forum posts
82 photos

If you run your DTI on the near side of the backplate, you'll get an indication of how much deflection happened during the facing cut.

Martin.

Perko713/08/2018 08:36:16
278 forum posts
23 photos

Have you checked that the cross-slide is actually running at 90deg to the bed? If the gibs have been adjusted incorrectly it may have skewed the cross-slide slightly, even though it is tight and does not move when pressured. Not noticeable on longitudinal cuts but will definitely show up on a large diameter facing cut.

Maybe clamp a test bar horizontally across the face of the chuck or backplate, bring the dti up to it close to one end, then use the cross-slide to move to the other end and see how much run-out. Rotate the spindle through 180deg and do it again. Assuming no play in the spindle or the chuck mounting, the difference in run-out for each pass will be a measure of the accuracy of your cross-slide adjustment.

KWIL13/08/2018 09:45:29
3111 forum posts
56 photos

Why is Pete Rimmer's comment being ignored?

He is correct, you cannot measure the cross slide error by using the cross slide as your fixed plane of reference, better Jason's straight edge and feeler gauge.

John Haine13/08/2018 09:50:57
2590 forum posts
133 photos

I have always understood that lathes are built/adjusted to face slightly concave as that's better from a fit p.o.v. than convex, and this is done by slightly offsetting the headstock but having the cross slide perpendicular to the axis. So this may indicate that the h/s has too much offset.

Andrew Johnston13/08/2018 10:10:06
avatar
4775 forum posts
538 photos
Posted by John Haine on 13/08/2018 09:50:57:

................ and this is done by slightly offsetting the headstock but having the cross slide perpendicular to the axis.

That would mean you'd be doomed to turn taper. I've got a swivelling workhead on my cylindrical grinder, specifically for grinding tapers. It's much more likely it is done by machining the cross slide dovetails slightly off perpendicular to the saddle.

Andrew

SillyOldDuffer13/08/2018 10:19:39
4587 forum posts
980 photos

I've confirmed there is a problem. I took another 0.2mm off the face last night and got a similar result. Locking the top-slide properly nearly halved the error, so that was part of the problem, but locking didn't eliminate it.

The test I believe confirms the error is the amount of visible light appearing under a straight-edge. The straight-edge shows the lathe is cutting concave (which is correct). Assuming I'm applying it correctly, a DTI shows the error to be excessive (about 0.08mm over 50mm) . For comparison Schlesinger's target for facing is 0.02mm over 300mm. (Thank you Michael for that information.)

I need to finish the job I'm doing and then investigate further. At the moment the lathe is filthy (cutting cast-iron), and everything needs a good clean before jumping to conclusions. Sleeping on it, I thought of a few more checks. I don't think they're likely to be loose but I need to confirm the tool-shank is clamped firmly to the top-slide and that the top-slide is tight on the saddle.

After that, I shall proceed as per Perko7, thank you for the suggestions.

As an observation, I've seen dozens of posts discussing Rollie's Dad, tailstock and other 'along the spindle axis' alignment tests, but I don't recall similar interest in facing accuracy. Perhaps flat facing isn't critical for many jobs, provided concavity prevents rocking. Even so, has anyone else measured their lathe's facing performance?

Dave

PS Certainly not ignoring Pete Rimmer!

 

 

 

Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 13/08/2018 10:20:28

All Topics | Latest Posts

Please login to post a reply.

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
ChesterUK
Ausee.com.au
Eccentric July 5 2018
TRANSWAVE Converters
Eccentric Engineering
Meridienne Sept 2019
Advertise With Us
Warco
emcomachinetools
Allendale Electronics
Subscription Offer

Latest "For Sale" Ads
Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest