Here is a list of all the postings blowlamp has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.
|Thread: Alibre Pro / Expert and AlibreCam|
Which level of Alibre CAM are considering, as there is a large difference in price & features between the options?
|Thread: DHL Rip Off|
Rip offs are everywhere.
|Thread: Home Automation Technique|
..."Measuring temperature is important for calculating the relative humdity. However, theoretically I need the absolute humdity level to decide whether to start pumping air. And the temperature inside and out will be approx the same and only varies from 25 degC on a cool night to 35 degC on a hot day. So basic humidity is all I need."...
If you need a humidity sensor device, then I can confirm that is what I am using in the form of a Sonoff TH10 (plus the sensor).
The eWeLink app allows me to select temperature or humidity. I have it set to switch on my bathroom fan when humidity reaches 75%. and off when below this figure.
It's been working quite reliably for over a year now and still functions without a network connection once it has been programmed.
I use one of these to control an extractor fan in my bathroom.
|Thread: How to identify climb milling?|
Also be aware that milling a pocket reverses the climb/conventional direction of travel when compared to milling the outside of a pocket.
|Thread: Quality Problems With the Sieg sx2.7|
Is this meant as a joke or an insult?
I don't understand the logic of this argument.
How did Colchester, Harrison and all the other machine tool manufacturers manage to export their machines abroad without them losing precision
|Thread: Covid causing mental health issues.|
As we've been told, this virus isn't ever going away, so we're going to live like this forever.
We need to embrace new ways of communicating without the need for embracing physically.
Be kind, be strong, cling on.
I'll cheer you up!
Nothing like some music & dance to lift the spirit.
'Staying apart brings us closer together'.
|Thread: Changes to Fusion 360 Terms|
Unless it's very exceptional integrated (expensive) software then I tend to find one side is better than the other.
Because of that, I have gone down the route of finding a CAD system I can get along with, and secondly having a selection of CAM systems that have strengths in various areas, because I haven't found one that does, or is strong, in everything.
However, I'm certainly interested in what you have to show us.
Occasionally, I have wrongly set something in CAM and produced gcode with long lead-ins or lead-outs... ...just that is painful to see in action, so don't underestimate how you might feel when one of your jobs has the tool jumping all over the place.
The other bad news is that the Steep & Shallow milling strategy appear to be for the chop in the free version come October.
I can't imagine being happy using my little CNC lathe without rapids. The thought of watching the tool endlessly trundle its way back to the start point of a long part at around 100mm/min feed rate, when I know it could easily zoom back at 1500mm/min is more than I could stand.
I've got Fusion 360, but I prefer to program my lathe with eCam, even though it cost €150.00 rather than being free. It seems like a reasonable purchase now, given this news.
From the Fusion 360 Website:
What does no rapid moves mean?
Removing rapid moves means that all toolpaths will use High Feed, where the maximum feedrate for linking moves is the cut feedrate. You can still decrease the feedrate of linking moves if you want but you won’t be able to raise the high feed value above the cut feedrate.
That'll throw a spanner in the works for some jobs.
|Thread: Facing parallel between centres.|
The reason to do it between centres is that this way provides an intrinsically 'perfect' solution to the problem.
Assuming the lathe is facing-up correctly and the headstock & tailstock centres are in proper alignment with each other, then this should be a simple job.
I say it's a 'perfect' solution because it requires no setting up with gauges or other tools. Therefore, it can be removed and replaced at will, with no loss of repeat accuracy. The end faces are generated, which is a (theorectically) perfect way to create an object, as it isn't reliant upon things like exact tool geometries or how precisely the tool is aligned to the job.
In contrast to face milling the ends, you would have to be sure the milling spindle axis is set exactly perpendicular to the table movement as well as ensure the table working surface is flat and perpendicular too. The effect of any inaccuracies would reflect in the job by faces not being parallel or slightly hollow due to spindle misalignment.
How about 'evenly spaced' or just 'offset'?
So am I correct in thinking that you started this thread after you had actually completed the job
|Thread: New Covid Rules|
Do you mean with regard to wearing a mask? If so, you should be able to use the government risk assessment.
|Thread: Facing parallel between centres.|
Assuming the part has been fully roughed out and now only needs the finishing cuts, this would be my checklist:
1/ Ensure the lathe is facing square & flat:
Do a light facing cut on some (scrap maybe?) material mounted in a chuck and place a straight edge over the face to ensure it's been machined flat or slightly hollow. This is desirable to prevent rocking when assembled to the milling machine.
2/ Ensure the lathe cuts parallel between centres:
Machine the length of some bar (between centres) to see if both ends come out at the same diameter. If not, then adjust the tailstock until they do.
Note. If your facing cut gave a slightly humped result, you could compensate this out by setting the tailstock over towards the operator to make the lathe cut a slightly smaller diameter at the tailstock end. Doing this will tend to make facing cuts hollow too.
Now the lathe is set up properly, mount the job between centres. Face & turn to diameter (at the tailstock end only), then swap the job end for end and repeat.
Edited By blowlamp on 13/09/2020 12:18:57
Edited By blowlamp on 13/09/2020 12:19:44
Are you talking about the top and bottom (end) faces being out of parallel or a variation in diameter between each end?
If it's the diameters that differ, then you need to adjust the tailstock to correct the slight error you have. However, if you can reverse the workpiece end for end between cuts at the tailstock end only, then you should be able to get a better result, as long as you don't disturb the cross slide setting between those cuts.
How is the parallelism over the 4" length?
|Thread: New Covid Rules|
Thanks, Dave, for confirming I hadn't missed anything in the T&Cs. What's 'The Tea Room' for then?
Whilst on the topic of do's & don'ts, I ask moderators to be more aware of casual racism in some peoples posts with regard to how they sometimes refer to products made by the population of China. This is done as if they are intrinsically inferior by virtue of the nationality of the people that made them, rather than the fact they are made to be more affordable - that is, down to the price demanded by the seller.
Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!
You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.
Click THIS LINK for full contact details.
For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.