By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more

Member postings for Martin of Wick

Here is a list of all the postings Martin of Wick has made in our forums. Click on a thread name to jump to the thread.

Thread: Advice acquiring single phase motor for Elliott Pillar Drill
01/04/2021 16:08:38

Hmm....

I urge caution using ONLY VFD for setting drilling speeds. Unless you have a fancy VFD with vector control, I find power drops off quite sharply below about 1/3 plated motor speed. So when you need the power for that large hole in some cast steel, 'taint there unless you have selected a decent ratio on the pulleys. And, if you are trying to extract torque in any quantity for a long period at low RPM, your motor will be sucking up a bunch of amps and getting toasty warm - best stop when you sense the acrid fumes!

On a lot of the older 'workshop' brit drilling machines, rated say at 3/4 or 1 inch capacity, it has always struck me that the lowest speed, seems scarily high, typically 400 to 600 RPM (it may be because I am wary of the nasty bite a drill is capable of if not careful). For example, my the lowest belt speed is 450 RPM which is deemed OK for 1" HSS drill speed for industrial Gradgrinds to suck their pound of flesh (quite literally I suspect) from man and machine.

BUT, I wouldn't want to attempt hole opening to 1" at that speed with a manually held vice however, using the VFD to give what for me would be a comfortable speed of 150 RPM, I could stall the motor. So ended up clamping down and doing the job in the safe way at about 300 RPM.

Neither, out of sheer laziness, would I rely on setting the mechanical speed  at 2000 RPM and just use the VFD to turn it down to an appropriate workpiece speed for the same reason. Always best to change belt position if you can.

For the average run of hole drilling from 1/8 to 1/2, I am quite happy to plod along at timorous speeds between 400 and 600 RPM more or less irrespective of material and would go much lower if |I could for larger holes.

I did explore the possibility fitting a 6 pole motor to reduce the available speeds on the Denford by about 1/3, although only 550w, it was a bit of a monster compared the original and considerable work to adapt, so it gathers dust for now.

 

 

Edited By Martin of Wick on 01/04/2021 16:15:07

01/04/2021 12:31:26

| Kevin it is usually very easy to alter the connections in the motor terminal box,

....Yeah well maybe..... if you are lucky and the motor is configured that way. With older motors, I have found that they tend to have been designed for industrial use and be single voltage star connected without the facility for alternate connections in the junction box. If you want to re configure these type motors as delta you will have to dig around and find the star connection point in the windings - and even if you can get at that easily, you have to consider whether the wire grade used is suitable for higher currents (probably ok for a drill).

Like the OP, I acquired an old Denford, couldn't re-configure the 3P motor as the star point was not accessible without potential damage to an otherwise excellent motor and resorted to a cheap and nasty step up inverter (250 to 380v which works fine). Slightly scary as you have upwards of 380v floating about at the back of your drill, so need to use a bit of care when wiring up.

Choices for the OP...

It is probably quite a good motor so if you can reconfigure the old motor to delta easily, use a low cost 250v single to 3 phase inverter.

Otherwise if comfortable with higher voltages in your workshop, use a more expensive 250 to 380v inverter.

Otherwise, you can obtain imperial B56 frame motors from Newton Tesla (at a price).

Otherwise you are in the realm of searching on line markets, for S/H imperial single phase (usually split phase start windings with centrifugal switch) . Check specs and motor plate carefully!

or go down the route of adapting a cheap metric capacitor run motor (at 550w usually 80 frame size so 19mm shaft, but I did once see a 71 frame with a more convenient 14mm shaft).

Thread: brushless DC motor for mini lathe
27/03/2021 09:57:12

Been longing for an excuse to get one of these  motors and have a tinker as a potential for the CML.

£75, 3 days out of Germany no handling or VAT to pay - go figure!

Findings:

Quite a neat unit with assorted fittings that may be adaptable for mounting etc

As usual, modest documentation, but there was a parameter sheet covering basic set up BUT.... with this example some parameters could not be altered as per sheet (up to 5000 RPM), in particular speed which is set up restricted to a max  of 3500 RPM, motor torque adjustment, braking, ramp speed etc. adjustable.

Fairly easy to set up and run out of the box. Low speed limited to 200 RPM, appears to have some very serious grunt at low RMP, but sincerely doubt if duty power is anywhere near 750W - like most RoC products claim probably represents maximum power at the point of failure. I usually factor RoC Watts by 0.6 which in this case gives about 400W as a probable duty rating. Not withstanding the stump pulling torque of the motor, this feels about right, subjectively. Would be nice if anyone with access to a dynamometer could test one across the speed range.

You could lash one up and run a machine with the supplied control equipment - basically gives you forward, reverse, off, slow running, variable min to max (controlled by the hall sensor as explained earlier). There are basic interlocks, so if you leave the control position at high speed and power up, a warning condition is displayed and the motor will not start up until the control position has been zeroed.

It would be best to make up a basic control pendant in a small project box with a trimpot circuit say 2 x 5K Ohm with a decent wirewound 1 turn final pot (say 47K) tuned to control between 2.4v and 4.2v. Hopefully, about 10% of pot movement will output the non running signal, another 20% the slow running output and the remaining control movement will be sufficient for the variable speed range. You could always use a multiturn pot if you needed ultra fine control but I wouldn't have the patience for the amount of dial twirling required!

In addition, reversing can be taken from the S switch on the mini control panel to a momentary press release switch on the pendant (if you want reverse operation).

E stop will be accomplished by (press to break) interrupting the low voltage control signal input back to the motor driver. I haven't tested this exact mechanism, but if you unplug the Hall device from the motor driver, it shuts down the motor and sets a fault condition on the motor driver. The unit has to be powered down to clear the fault condition.

All in all, quite a good little drop in unit for the smaller lathes and mills to replace the usual existing 4000 RPM brushed motors. Problematic with yer trad Britisher lathe due to the high motor speed compared to ye olde worlde 4 pole 50Hz induction motor. May require an intermediate shaft for low speed lathes.

B for attainment

D+ for effort (lack of documentation and flexibility)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited By Martin of Wick on 27/03/2021 10:04:21

Edited By Martin of Wick on 27/03/2021 10:16:26

Thread: Replacing Oilite Bushes in ML7 Countershaft bracket
06/02/2021 15:51:41

I have had to do this for a 7 and S7, and confirm it is not a trivial job, especially if you intend to fit a new shaft. Hammering them in, using G clamps etc is not recommended, oilites will distort in a heartbeat.

You absolutely do need to make up a pulling mandrel, find lengths of threaded bar and have some appropriately sized tube washers and nuts to use as pullers.

Your mandrel should be stepped to conform to the exact external diameter of the shaft (avoid being smaller) with the wider portion say 10 thou less than the id of the bearing recess. The part upon which the bearing sits needs to be slightly (4-5 mm) longer than the bearing. Tap the mandrel for 8 or 10mm threaded pulling rod.

Pulling the old bearings out is easy, pulling the new ones in needs a bit of care on the initial alignment. Soak bearings in oil and use lots of oil when placing bearing on mandrel (it may be tight)

You may need to wring the mandrel back out of the bearing, or even need to pull it out.

My nasty experience came when I discovered the new shaft was a wringing fit in the new bearings. I tired slow running the shaft as a bearing run in, but it was clear that it was seizing.

Now here is the thing, you don't want to ream this type of bearing and even if you did, how would it be possible to do it accurately in situ? I solved this problem by making up a polished olive that was a couple of thou bigger than the shaft id. This is pulled through the tight bearing making it conform to the required size (process may have to be repeated). These bearings have a porosity, so within reason can be 'squeezed' to size.

Eventually, the shaft fitted albeit a little tight, but easily enough that after a bit of running in, all was well. The running in consisted of: run the shaft at min primary speed, as soon as the bearing gets cup of coffee hot, say over 50 C. stop and allow to cool. Repeat until happy that the heat build up is reducing.

With the lathe back in service, keep bearings well oiled and monitor temperature, ceasing operations if getting too hot until well bedded in. A year or so after fitting, my countershaft bearings get just slightly warm after a couple of hours run. I make sure the oil cups are full before every use.

Thread: Parting 1 1/2 phosphor Bronze
06/02/2021 12:53:31

Thanks to all responders, problem solved I think.....

1.5 in PB parting

A HSS blade tool 'good enough' to chew its way through bits o' steel is just not going to cut a chunky bit of bronze.

Using a 2mm quality cobalt HSS parting blade, straight off the grinder, the workpiece was sliced through it as if it was a piece of soft cheese, tool set slightly high, cut at about 100 rising to 150 rpm with neatcut. So I learn that a really, really, sharp tool is what is needed!

I take the point about blade overhang, but with the GHThomas / AKA Hemingway rear post you dont have an option to change projection easily as the tool height is defined by the tool angle which is designed in at 8 degrees. This results in a slightly scary projection of 1 1/8 inch on the large blade. Am considering making an alternate turret to take a horizontal blade - one day!

M

06/02/2021 09:26:36

Thanks to all,

should have said, the lathe is a Myford S7.

It just seems strange the HSS parting blade set up that was performing flawlessly with steel and silver steel moments before, completely balked at the bronze.

I usually set the blades about 5 thou above centre line using the rear tool post (and deal with the annoying little pip later) Perhaps I need to set the HSS a little higher as I couldn't seem to start the cut with that configuration. The blades project quite a way from the mount on the GHT toolpost, so perhaps that is contributing to the problem.

Using the MGEHR carbide tool I was eventually able to establish a consistent ribbon of cut material about as thick as aluminium foil, but is was clearly hard work for the lathe. On inspection the actual cut surface was slightly dished towards the headstock, as if the forces involved had tried to drag the spindle out of the bearings or twist the blade and this was probably contributing to the heat build up. The blade was set as true as was possible to measure using a parallel off the chuck face and the carriage locked, so I dont know what was happening there.

Plan is to resharpen the HSS blades and set 10 thou above centre and have another go, If that doesn't work, put a new blade in the MGEHR, if that fails, buy a bigger carbide parting tool and if that fails, give up and use something softer!

Will feed back any results good or bad!

05/02/2021 20:13:36

A torrid afternoon trying to part some rounds of PB - at least that is what it was sold as.

No problems encountered turning and facing dry with tangential tool HSS so wasn't anticipating problems parting.... Oh dear, how wrong....

Using a GHT backpost and eclipse style taper blades (set at correct height) at speeds between 150 to 400 the blades made no impression on the bar and just bounced off, refusing to bite. When I eventually managed to force the tool in it generated so much noise with the blade twisting and bucking that I chickened out lest I break a blade.

Managed to half do one using a tiny MGEHR insert holder not big enough to cut through completely and had to finish with a hacksaw. It was a scary operation all round, needing about 400 rpm for a steady cut and the job became so hot that the cutting oil was burnt on to it!

Can anyone please suggest an approach that works for them when parting PB? what speed, oil/no oil, or different grinds for the blades etc. (currently ground flat, sloped down at 8 degrees giving circa 10 t0 12 degrees front rake).

Thanks M

 

 

 

 

Edited By Martin of Wick on 05/02/2021 20:27:55

Thread: Drill grinding jigs - optimising the use of
03/02/2021 18:36:20

For basic drill sharpening I use both the old style Picador vertical spindle jig and a properly made (apparently) slant spindle clone drilling jig. much has been said about both in the forum.

In their unique way they both deliver reasonable looking drill re-grinds with satisfactory point angle and what appears to be an acceptable heel clearance (as long as some care is taken) . Best results are usually obtained with a clamp bar on the drill so each side is ground at a true 180 degrees where possible.

To improve repeatability, I thought the spreadsheet model below might be helpful (available from this site).

Joerg Hugel's Drill Performance Tables - Processes (model-engineer.co.uk)

The idea was to be able to generate a table of drill lip projections for differing diameters at differing point angles for the jigs (118, 136, and possibly 98 degrees). Hopefully, I could then make a small gauge to consistently set the point projection and lip angle and then produce grinds where relief is within the optimum range on a consistent basis (without the usual trial and error each drill grinding session). Optimum would be a projected clearance that increases from between 12 to 15 degrees at the outer edge rising to between 20 and 30 degrees at the centre.

I was wondering if anyone had investigated this spreadsheet model and attempted to ground truth it?

The first issue I had (after measuring up the jigs and calculating their geometry parameters) is that the two variable parameters that actually define the grinding cone are not direct entry - you have calculate them by an intermediate step then check to see whether you have got close to your desired axis offsets- Doh!

I was also wondering how reliable the results are? modelling the Picador (easier because the cylinder axis is vertical) the results sort of confirmed what I was getting - ie the picador suggested settings generating rather too much clearance (specially in smaller sizes).

For the clone jig, the model results suggested that an extra 5mm of forward projection was needed on top the projection required for the diameter (forward projection of 1 Dd in the clone instructions, the sideways projection is fixed on these jigs). I find with the clone jig that I usually need less rather than more projection, but that may be because I can only eyeball the finished product, which may look OK but is actually sub optimal.

Predicted chisel angles could quite interesting too...

It is quite a useful paper and spreadsheet model, well worth a look and I would welcome input from anybody that has reviewed it or attempted to use the results to finesse their drill grinding activities!

M.

Thread: Drilling crankshaft hole
19/01/2021 14:38:15

I have a similar issue, but not quite such a fugly casting as that one - I assume it is quite small, so my choice would be:

set up as best you can in a vice with the shaft as parallel and normal to the cutting plane as you can judge by eye (by any means possible with whatever packing you need).

mill base as reference plane, mill long edge of base likewise

prepare piece of scrap to parallel on all surfaces large enough to overhang base of casting by 20mm or so, bolt said casting to your prepared plate with at least two fixings of appropriate size - If you are really keen you could mill out a slot in the mounting plate to fit the milled base to ensure stability for subsequent operations.

set up plate with mounted casting in vice square and parallel, mill port face and shaft bearing boss face flat, turn over mill rear of port block flat (and rear of shaft boss).

Without removing, find centre of crank boss, punch, spot drill, then drill drill through crank shaft bearing boss with correct size of drill prepared for brass/bronze etc in one go.

With luck this should result in the main surfaces parallel and normal to each other.

nb The author accepts no responsibility in any way for broken drills, mis- aligned or oversize holes or any other unsatisfactory outcomes, how so ever caused cheeky

 

 

Edited By Martin of Wick on 19/01/2021 14:48:45

Thread: Mini lathe feed
13/01/2021 14:34:11

You need to check the geartrain/change gear set up behind the left cover.

1 with lathe unplugged, first release quadrant to free change gear mounted to leadscrew from any other gears in the train.

2 turn the change gear on leadscrew manually to check leadscrew rotates, if so, engage carriage feed lever to check for expected movement forward and reverse - if carriage is not moving then investigate for correct movement of half nuts (by peering at right end of carriage with a torch to confirm that the half nuts move together and apart to clasp the leadscrew).

3) if that checks out alright, check that the change gears you expect to have in the train can be made to mesh correctly and check by rotating chuck by hand to confirm motion all through the gear train to the leadscrew - if not look for change gear mounting issues or potential damage (grub screws or nuts to tighten etc)

4) check operation of tumbler reverse jockey wheels - correct engagement etc

5) if all the above is Greek to you, download this manual....

g0765_m.pdf (grizzly.com)

 

Edited By Martin of Wick on 13/01/2021 14:36:51

Thread: Myford ml7 about to buy
12/01/2021 14:58:25

Personally, I wouldn't touch a lathe with no provenance, unless you particularly want an expensive, irritating and time consuming project

From your description so far you have already added up a couple of hundred to the base price, added to which is probability of needing to replace all bearings and motorising shafts etc, the cost to achieve a even a mediocre machine is getting up towards a grand - Go to Myfords site and E bay and start adding up the costs of all running part replacements - if you can find them and you may want to think again.

It is more likely than not that the bed will need a regrind and if you regrind the bed you will need to do the saddle etc.

It will likely cost at over £300 excluding time and travelling IF you can find someone to do it.

I had a 7 done by Slideway services 5 or 6 years ago and it was £250 then- since that time the owner has sold up I am not sure if the new owner is amenable to small jobs.

Sent you a PM for basic static Myford checks

 

 

Edited By Martin of Wick on 12/01/2021 15:05:31

Thread: Postal Imports ... Notice 143
02/01/2021 23:15:23

Well, I see what the intent is, it is just that the torrent of words is difficult to interpret or understand the practicalities ( dont get bogged down in petifoging detail, just make it happen.....).

I get it now that the < £135 just pushes the tax on small stuff to PoS so is not paid at the border.

As SD states, I suspect all non VAT declared goods or items from vendors not identified as registered for HMRC VAT will be turned over to Royal Mail/AN Other Courier to collect the tax for HMRC and charge the purchaser whatever they like for the service.

In theory most purchases should eventually funnel through the few registered OMPs or privateers that are willing to dance to HMRC's tune because of the extreme handling charge penalty.

Brilliant really, without lifting a finger HMRC extract their extra pound of flesh. But I wonder how many dodgy far east Arthur Daily types will register, collect the VAT, trouser said VAT, then suddenly disappear - Watchagonna do then HMRC - send a gun boat, start another Opium War..?

There is some benefit in that it should deliver some uptick in trade for pukka UK based retailers.

Edited By Martin of Wick on 02/01/2021 23:17:06

Thread: Amadeal lathes - Any good??
02/01/2021 20:20:24

Nah,

don't waste yer money on 'special' brands when starting out - you will always be able to move a cheap and cheerful lathe on at little risk or cost if you tire of it. Remember 9 out of 10 Myfords advertised for sale (and others of the same ilk) prefer Chum.

As you learn and improve, you will begin to form a view of the exact type of machine you really need and can take your time sourcing it. If you have the room, you may well find you keep the uncomplaining mini lathe to do the gnarly, horrid, cruel, abusive jobs that you wouldn't dare inflict on the frail 'workshop queen' of a certain age, preening herself under her cover in the corner...

Thread: Postal Imports ... Notice 143
02/01/2021 19:59:24

Vic,

I think you are right, but I cant see how that will work in practice for direct purchases from the far east (ie not from Amazon Ebay etc)- evidenced by the 'something so wonderful will be done to trap the miscreants, that we know not what it will be...' tone of the guidance. It appears to be a work in progress to me.

For it to work as suggested, the likes of AliBaba would have to agree to collect tax on UK sales on behalf of HMRC. I suppose they (and others) might do this off the back of some wider trade deal long term but I cant see them rushing to fall into line just because HMRC say so. I expect AB want to protect their revenue, but the truth is, they could probably buy this entire country out of petty cash, chop it into little pieces and flush it down the pan, without blinking.

Secondly, when a purchase is made from Ali, It has been my experience that a package arrives from a relatively anonymous small reseller / sole trader and there is no obvious link to the OMP on the packaging. Are all these myriads of backroom traders somewhere in the middle of China suddenly going to feel the need to kowtow to HMRC?

I suppose HMRC could take the line that if goods turn up with a declared value but no VAT registration identifier, they would simply confiscate the goods to encourage the others...

Thread: Amadeal lathes - Any good??
01/01/2021 20:05:17

I had a CJ18 from Amadeal that ran fine but required a fair bit of fettling, but all relatively minor stuff and probably no more than would have been required for similar lathes in that class.

They replaced a 4 Jaw chuck with faulty jaws that I had had for over a year (but not used), so have been content with their support.

Thread: Postal Imports ... Notice 143
01/01/2021 18:19:53

Still not there yet, so is this the deal then....

1) Purchase from an OMP or similar registered for tax purposes in the UK, the OMP very kindly collects the taxes for HMRC on all purchases originating Ex UK..... captures majority of sales and drop shippers etc without involvement of Border Farce.

2) Purchase from trader Ex UK... (including the likes of Ali, Bang, Gear, Light, etc, because I can just see the likes of Jack Ma begging to be an unpaid tax collector for HMRC), then Border Farce or shipper may become involved as goods cross the border and calculate tax on item or items only where declared value + handling etc is >£135, because otherwise they would have employ the whole country in processing every single piece of foreign mail with a declared value.

Presumably if you purchase items from Europe, they will be sold net of sending country VAT but chargeable at UK rates at the border (if above £135) plus any charges the shipping company wishes to apply.

Remember what the nice man said - 'no non tariff barriers to trade...' Waaahhaaahhaa!

01/01/2021 14:02:36

I don't understand....

on the one hand I thought that as of now, the minimum tax threshold for VAT/ excise/import duties was to be reduced from £15 to zero therefore VAT etc. is now payable on all purchases via 'online market places' offshore vendors etc....

On the other hand, this link seems to imply the minimum tax threshold for offshore purchases is £135.00?? Or have I just misinterpreted?

I am clearly in a post seasonal brain fog of too much food n booze so could someone that understands the regulatory mind please explain in simple terms what the tax position is likely to be for offshore purchases?

Much thanks!

Thread: Flexispeed fixed steady
16/12/2020 12:16:55

Have been through this with an EW lathe. I am afraid you have a vanishingly small probability of acquiring an original item at any price.

Your options are

  • to fabricate one from scratch - much the cheapest option
  • to adapt one to fit from a similar sized machine (say Cowels or more realistically one of the ubiquitous small Chinese lathes C0, C1, C2/3, small Proxon, Peatol etc class of machine

suppliers include M-Machine metals for material , Arc, Cowels, Axminster,  on line markets, etc.

Edited By Martin of Wick on 16/12/2020 12:21:25

Thread: Have You considered getting a 3D printer
11/12/2020 16:08:31

Wouldn't be without mine, just a budget Creality Ender but have made everything on it from replacement fan on a jig saw, lathe change gears, saddle stop, chuck spiders, nudgers, spacers, Stephenson's Rocket, servo frames for RC gliders, patterns, moulds, sundry replacement bits for broken/missing 'things' round the house and on and on...lost track really.

They could all be considerably improved with some effort, but despite various plans to improve my Ender it is still pretty much as it came out of the box... because it just delivers consistent output in the 'good enough' spectrum.

In future, I hope there is some improvements in media technology addressing issues such as strength, bonding, stability etc. Ideally for a structural product, we would like a filament with the strength and stability of nylon or polycarbonate, the ease of printing and resilience of PLA and the post processing properties ABS.

Thread: ER collet size help
11/12/2020 15:08:13

Probably too good to bin.

First find someone with a 25 collet holder and check that they might fit (say this because there was 6 or 7mm clearance in the back of the ER32 holder I use.

Otherwise, just make a collet holder to suit your requirement, seen some drawings in one of the threads here for basic dimensions, obviously you will have to make radial dim to suit 25s and axial to suit 32s checking to see if there is any change to angular tapers. If the nose angle is as per standard you can save work and just purchase a 25 collet closer.

Edited By Martin of Wick on 11/12/2020 15:13:34

Magazine Locator

Want the latest issue of Model Engineer or Model Engineers' Workshop? Use our magazine locator links to find your nearest stockist!

Find Model Engineer & Model Engineers' Workshop

Latest Forum Posts
Support Our Partners
cowells
Dreweatts
Eccentric July 5 2018
Eccentric Engineering
Rapid RC
Subscription Offer

Latest "Wanted" Ads
Get In Touch!

Do you want to contact the Model Engineer and Model Engineers' Workshop team?

You can contact us by phone, mail or email about the magazines including becoming a contributor, submitting reader's letters or making queries about articles. You can also get in touch about this website, advertising or other general issues.

Click THIS LINK for full contact details.

For subscription issues please see THIS LINK.

Digital Back Issues

Social Media online

'Like' us on Facebook
Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
 Twitter Logo

Pin us on Pinterest